🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim endured losing against lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Regarding System and Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Authority Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Soccer Order: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then bin them for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.